Riding position data

Cruiser vs Touring riding position

For the default rider, Cruiser vs Touring: knee angle 96.4° vs 73.0°, elbow angle 134.5° vs 135.6°, seat 700 vs 750 mm.

The knee difference comes entirely from the footpegs.

Load Cruiser Load Touring

Cruiser vs Touring angles by rider height

Rider height, mm
60°80°100°120°15501650175018501950Rider height, mmCruiserTouring
Cruiser vs Touring by rider height
Rider heightCruiser kneeTouring kneeCruiser elbowTouring elbow
1550 mm (5 ft 1 in)114.7°84.5°un­reach­ableun­reach­able
1650 mm (5 ft 5 in)104.7°78.4°152.1°156.6°
1750 mm (5 ft 9 in)96.4°73.0°134.5°135.6°
1850 mm (6 ft 1 in)89.7°68.5°123.6°123.5°
1950 mm (6 ft 5 in)83.8°64.4°115.7°114.7°

Body sizes are estimated from height. Hip and lean stay fixed, so shorter riders get straighter arms. Measure to be sure.

For a 1550 mm rider, Touring bends the knee 30.2° more than Cruiser; for a 1950 mm rider, 19.4° more.

Cruiser vs Touring modeled results
MetricCruiserTouring
Knee angle96.4°73.0°
Elbow angle134.5°135.6°
Inseam minus seat+142 mm+92 mm
Torso lean8°10°
Seat height700 mm750 mm

How Touring differs from Cruiser

From the hip, Touring's bar is 30 mm further forward and 30 mm higher than Cruiser's. Its peg is 240 mm further back and 10 mm lower.

Assumptions

One example rider, 1750 mm (5 ft 9 in) tall, on every page. Only the bike and lean change.

Torso length
504 mm
Upper arm
285 mm
Forearm
345 mm
Thigh
429 mm
Shin
499 mm
Inseam
842 mm

How to read these angles

How this model was checked